Supporting veterans

An interesting debate is going on between Senators Obama and McCain about the Webb-Hagel GI Bill. Senator Obama criticised McCain for not supporting the bill (it passed, 75-22, with McCain as one of three abstentions). Obama portrayed McCain as unsympathetic to veterans, prompting him to respond that he knows whereof he speaks, and that he supports a different, less generous benefit.

I think the true debate is more subtle than either side paints it, but McCain's central premise, while logical, is extremely distasteful:

Our bill has a sliding scale that offers generous benefits to all
veterans, but increases those benefits according to the veteran’s
length of service...otherwise, we will encourage more people to leave the military after they have completed one enlistment.

Essentially he wants to use the GI bill to bribe soldiers and marines into re-upping multiple times. While I can see why this is useful to the armed forces, it seems contrary to the idea of a voluntary force. We don't conscript our citizens, and so those who choose to serve — for any amount of time — should get the fullest extent of our gratitude. If McCain wants to encourage reenlistment he should sponsor a bill that goes above and beyond the current one, not shortchanging GIs who serve only one or two tours out of choice.

Coupla' jawns.

I don't usually care for Maureen Dowd, but her editorial about the Dem primary today is pretty funny. Checked out the Cambridge Beer Festival yesterday, which was a good time. Word to the wise: cranberry beer is a mistake. Also picked up a hardback copy of "The Grass Crown" at the charity sale there for 50p (original price £23!). I believe MRhe recommended this to me, and the price was so good I practically had no choice!

Also, I hear some basketball team won the first game of the semi-finals.

Smile

Fascinating piece by Errol Morris in the Times about one of the infamous Abu Ghraib photographs.